Quick answer
A result needs a reason, not just a link
Check all nine evidence points using only what you can currently see or trace. A high score means the row is a stronger research candidate; it does not verify the item, uploader, seller or transaction.
Field note
Nine-point checklist
These checkboxes are device-local page controls and are not submitted, saved or tracked by this site.
Field note
How to score a result
Strong shortlist candidate, but still not verified.
Research further. Name the missing evidence.
Weak evidence. Keep only if a specific check is realistic.
Remove for now rather than preserving an unexplained lead.
Field note
Strong example
Score: 8/9
The category, product code, source page, measurement notes and relevant photo angles align. QC images appear tied to the same code and source. Packaging weight remains an estimate, so the row stays “research candidate,” not “approved.”
Field note
Weak example
Score: 3/9
The thumbnail matches the category, but the watermarks change, the source link opens a different item and no size or weight context appears. The row has no clear recovery path, so remove it for now.
Field note
One-sentence save rule
Save only a result you can explain in one sentence, including both the useful evidence and the largest remaining unknown.
Field note
What to do next
If photos are the weak point, continue to the QC guide. If value depends on a rough delivery estimate, read the shipping weight guide. If identity, contact or payment feels unclear, stop and review buyer safety.
